Api 1163 download free

This standard is an umbrella document that provides performance-based requirements for ILI systems, including procedures, personnel, equipment, and associated software. Our policy towards the use of cookies Techstreet uses cookies to improve your online experience.

They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser. Alternatively, you can write your own serializer. Sorry, something went wrong.

I managed to get the indices of one object thanks to the first solution, using LowLevelInterface. Using once again LowLevelInterface. For those wondering, the buffers are stored in LittleIndian according to this file.

I started to try and get the indices first: I convert the string buffer to bytes to use it using bytes data, 'utf-8'. Then I go through the data using struct. I managed to get the same number of indices as indicated in the GeometryData , so I assume this works fine. But, I'm not getting the same amount of vertices as indicated in the GeometryData nor the same amount, nor three times the amount since I assumed that I should recover 3 floats, x,y,x for the vertices.

I assumed that it comes from the fact that the binary data is first encoded to base64 and then to string using UTF-8 I was only able to find pieces of code like here. So I tried to use the base64 python module after recovering the bytes from UTF-8, but I only found a few vertices. I just tried it as well. There are two reasons for the length difference of the vertex buffer. Because UTF-8 is a variable-width encoding, these are encoded as three bytes.

Everything else in my sample is one byte, hence the byte array is twice the number of replacement characters longer than the string. If I check the string value length before unpacking, it has the right length. Some byte sequences can never occur in UTF-8, those it may not be a good idea to do it this way. What happens to these byte sequences?

I forgot to mention that I unpacked vertices as doubles, thanks for the explanation though. I also noticed that the encoding is screwed. I followed your intuition, and I replaced in this file the line :. I don't know if this fix should be applied in other parts of the core code, nor if this changes some expecting behavior for plugins or other methods. If not, I'll post that fix as a PR. Cases and problems worked in class will be based on actual inspections of working pipeline systems. The course addresses both traditional pipeline methodologies as well as recent innovations, including the API Fitness-for-Service Standard.

API provide not only provides requirements for qualification of in-line ILI systems it also provides a framework for the successful development, implementation, and execution of a successful ILI program. Specific topics include the following:. All presentation material will be documented in an Adobe Acrobat PDF provided by download prior to the class. For this reason it is necessary to bring your laptop or tablet computer.

In addition participants will receive macro-enabled Excel spreadsheets that perform various calculations, including effective area metal loss assessment and pressure-cycle fatigue analysis.